India must hold her horses.
The trajectory of Indo-Pak relations
has been pretty simple: a collision course has been followed by both these
neighbors over the past 66 years. Let’s
not go into the main conflict and the crises that emanated from that. The piece
will shed light on a few sardonic antics shown by the Indian defense forces and
government/opposition off-late. In the
process this piece will deride
some hollow arguments made by the ever-growing clique of liberals in Pakistan.
Civilian supremacy is something that
many of us covet; often Indian Army is given credit for being truly
professional, for they haven’t as yet subverted the government. Yes indeed, it
is something creditable however; we need not compare the milieus of both the
countries. The difference was there for all to see. Had Nehru appointed General
P N Thappar as defense minister, for instance sake , things might have been
very different. One can disagree with many of the assertions made by General
Ved Prakash Malik in his book “Kargil:
from surprise to victory, but one remark is striking and thought-provoking
as regards the Indian Army being apolitical . “The
credit goes not only to the military and its traditions , but also to the
political leadership …….. The political leaders or the party members did not
make any attempt to politicize the armed forces.” This is what our liberals and
Army bashers should understand. However , the Indian military has out of her own accord sabotaged the peace process on a few
occasions , be it putting their foot down over the Siachen Accords or
Brasstacks or even Cold Start for that matter. For instance, in December, 2012,
the then commander of the Northern
Command, Lt Gen K T Parnaik disparaged Kayani on his overture of withdrawing
from the Siachen Glacier. Things took shape for the worse amidst façade of
peace-building and conflict-resolution efforts.
It was 4th January, 2013
when the green shirts under the captaincy of Misbah-ul-Haq defeated a
formidable Indian side in the 2nd ODI to take an unassailable lead
in the ODI series. Just after a few hours the Indian Army resorted to
unprovoked firing on the Line of Control (LOC), which resulted in the martyrdom
of Naik Aslam of the Pakistan Army. However, it was seldom reported in our
otherwise-vibrant media. Probably, they were showing too much fidelity to the
cause of Aman Ki Asha. However, on the 8th the Pakistani troops allegedly
beheaded an Indian soldier in the Meander sector. The Indian media known for
its war mongering , launched a virulent
attack on Pakistan day-in day-out. Is it conceivable that troops from any side
can cross the LOC and behead a soldier, given the fact that there are bunkers
and barbed wires on both sides of the LOC? If the alleged beheading turns out
to be true then it is not only barbaric, but shows the ineptitude of India’s
Northern Command, which was then commanded by Lt- Gen K T Parnaik. As expected,
things conflagrated with a hostile statement from the Indian Air Chief, Browne;
a 2-hour long press conference of General Bikram Singh. However, the General
cleverly dubbed these issues as “tactical in nature”. But talks of effective
vigil and dress down of local formation commanders meant that India was up to
something. The leader of the opposition, Sushma Swaraj demanded 10 Pakistani
heads. Sense prevailed on our side, as we did not see our military counterparts
giving such statements. Politicians from our side were seemingly not concerned!
The low-profile response from Pakistan was a good move, for statements carry
weight in the Indo-Pak theatre. A localized skirmish at the LOC has every
likelihood to escalate to the international border, especially keeping in view
India’s Cold Start Doctrine, something which merits another write-up. The scuffle of January showed that Indians
were utterly aggressive and Pakistan was acting gingerly.
Fast-forward to May, Nawaz Sharif
even before becoming PM for the third time made his intentions clear as regards
his India policy. Not only he invited his Indian counterpart on his oath-taking
ceremony, but also decided to institute an inquiry commission on the infamous
Kargil face-off. Many critics raised eyebrows over these benign overtures made
by Sharif, since India had again shown that how much they value a proven
terrorist: Sarabjeet Singh was given a grand funeral. Nonetheless, the border
spats in Ladakh kept the Indian establishment busy for some time and moreover,
both PM’s agreed to meet during next month’s General Assembly Session of the
UN.
Now, finally let’s delve on the
current and ever-increasing crisis. Pakistani Army allegedly crossed the LOC
and 5 miles inside Indian Poonch ambushed an Indian Army patrol and killed 5
soldiers. The Indian Defense Minister oscillated at the whims of hawkish
elements of the Indian opposition and media. His initial statement called the
attackers as terrorists, dressed in army uniform. Within 48 hours Antony took a
360 degree turn against Pakistan. In other words he played to the gallery. He
said “It is now clear that the specialist troops of Pakistan Army were involved
in this attack when a group from Pakistan- occupied Kashmir (PoK) side crossed
the LoC and killed our brave jawans,” Furthermore, he said that these acts will
alter their approach and posture on the LOC. “"We all know that nothing
happens from Pakistan side of LoC without support, assistance, facilitation and
often, direct involvement of Pakistan Army," Antony said. The visit of the
Indian Army Chief to the LOC with a mandate for a calibrated tactical response
is showing its effects. The Indian Army and BSF resorts to unprovoked firing
daily . It is not about the LOC only, but over the past few weeks the BSF have been violating
the sanctity of the Working Boundary in Sialkot and Shakhargarh,
injuring innocent Pakistani citizens. What will India gain from these
skirmishes, recriminations; vandalizing PIA offices; attacking the High
Commission in Delhi and blocking the “Dosti Bus”? India’s overall strategic designs are beyond
the scope of this article. However, the fact is that these aggressive signals
would not be a boon for South Asia’s strategic stability. Pakistan has been far
more cautious in its approach and rightly so. As nuclear powers both country’s
should act responsibly. It does not mean that we will reach a nuclear threshold
over this hyped and spiced-up LOC ingresses, but the fog of war is a reality,
to say the least.
A quote for all commanders,
especially those of the Indian Army.
“No battle plan survives contact with
the enemy.” Helmuth von Moltke.
Hawkish plans will be countered with
more hawkish ones.
Very well put! Both sides must exercise caution, especially the politicians, because as you rightly state, "for statements carry weight in the Indo-Pak theatre"! A theater it certainly is; a lot of posturing and play acting, but at what cost! Unfortunately, the elected representatives on both sides, those fanning flames of divisiveness, are mere politicians and not statesmen and visionaries!
ReplyDeletewww.iditis.blogspot.com
Thank you for reaching out on Twitter (sushr7). My previous comment as ' iditis' is my blogger ID
ReplyDeleteYou have correctly identified Indian Army's role in strained relations between Pak and India but these are tactical level issues.
ReplyDeleteA US think tank studied Pak-India relations in 1996 and concluded, "Enmity between Pak and India is fundamental as each serves as a limiting factor on other's aspirations. If for any reason Kashmir dispute was to disappear, there would be many other issues to querrel about". They were right e.g then, there was no issue of water and now it has emerged as a major irritant. Besides, we must remain cognizant of deep down animosity brewing in Hindu minds because of the fact that Muslims ruled over them for over 1000 years despite being in minority and when the system changed to majority rule decided to part ways on grounds that we were two different nations who could not live together. So while the leaders of two countries ever decide to talk to eachother, they must keep in mind two fundamentals:
1) Pakistan and India are two enemy states and will remain so unless Pakistani leadership totally succumbs and start acting as a pliant state (not acceptable to people of Pakistan).
2) Peace is imperative in the region as neither country can afford confrontation.
In my view, talks with India will never yield results unless we talk from a point of strength &, presently, we are not in a position.
Tahir Ali
Thank you for your comments; yes indeed, there are much more grave issues at the strategic level which merits another piece.
DeleteMr. Jaffery, I think what you meant was 180 degree turn unless you really meant 360 degree.
ReplyDeleteBtw, what I don't understand is the hysteria amongst Pakistani opinion makers and columnists about the so called 'cold start doctrine'. Afterall all major militaries in the world have their war strategies and doctrines about how they are gonna fight a war incase it was to breakout. And naturally, their will be both offensive and defensive strategies and plans drawn up. Pakistan Army too will be no exception to this common feature among armies around the world. One can bet with much elan that Pakistan Army too must be having various offensive plans drawn up against India to be acted upon in an emergency or war. So why such particular hue and cry singlemindedly being reflected upon the so called Indian offensive doctine named "Cold Start"???
Thank you for your feedback. I will shed-light on CSD in another piece.
Delete